Thursday, 18 February 2010

EU, US approve, Microsoft + Yahoo! search partnership is go

After announcing the search deal in July 2009, Yahoo! and Microsoft have finally received regulatory clearance from both the US Department of Justice and the EU. Under the agreement between the two companies, Yahoo! will use Microsoft's search platform to power its search results and paid search listings. Yahoo! will handle customer relations with high-volume advertisers for both companies. Self-service advertisers will continue to deal with Microsoft directly. A similar deal between Yahoo! and Google was abandoned after the Department of Justice threatened an antitrust lawsuit.

For Yahoo! users, the visible difference will be that Yahoo! search results will be identical to those of Microsoft's Bing. Yahoo! will continue to offer its own content to web users to provide more than just search results. The companies believe that this partnership will enable them to better compete with the dominant Google.

Google's dominance is indeed the reason that this deal was permitted where the Yahoo!-Google deal was not; with Yahoo! having only 7.4 percent of the search market and Microsoft's Bing only 3.2 percent, the tie-up will not make the search market substantially less competitive. Bing's market share has been increasing, especially in the US, but much of this growth has occurred at Yahoo!'s expense. The ten-year deal will provide Microsoft with considerably more access to the search market, and the company will also take on some 400 Yahoo! employees.

For its part, Yahoo! will receieve the lion's share of the advertising revenue—88 percent for the first five years—as well as cash payments totaling $150 million from Microsoft to help pay for the transition to the Bing technology. Yahoo! predicts annual operating profit growth of up to $500 million as a result of the partnership.

The technical aspects of the integration are likely to start within days. Yahoo! US should be using Bing by the end of the year; a full global transition will take longer, and is not expected to be complete until early 2012.

iSimulate pipes gestures and more into iPad simulator

Although Apple has yet to announce the exact date when the iPad will ship, or when it will even begin taking iPad application submissions, this lack of information hasn't stopped developers from working on apps specifically made for the device. Unlike when the iPhone SDK was released, however, developers don't have devices in hand to test their code on.

A company named vimov is attempting to address this problem with an update to its product for the iPhone and iPod touch, called iSimulate, that now allows developers to pipe accelerometer, multitouch, compass, and GPS data from the iPhone into the iPad simulator. Until now, developers had to make educated guesses based on past iPhone development experience, but iSimulate aims to help make the experience a little more painless.

Setup is pretty simple, according to one developer we spoke to: you only need to add a library into an existing iPad project and then connect to the simulator from the iSimulate client on your iPhone or iPod touch. The same developer, however, informed us that the system was far from perfect. Apparently, it's virtually impossible to know where you are touching in the simulator until you touch the screen on the iPhone; this is because the application isn't running on the phone, and instead, only a diagnostic screen is visible. Additionally, the response speed of the simulator leaves something to be desired.

Still, he said the GPS and accelerometer support could be very useful in development, especially since there's no other way to test this except with an iPhone or iPod touch. If Apple starts taking application submissions prior to the availability of iPad, devs are going to have to rely on applications like this to ensure their applications work properly at launch.

iBookstore won't mean the disappearance of $9.99 e-books

Publishers happily signed on to distribute e-books for the iPad via Apple's iBookstore, in part because it allowed more flexibility in pricing books above Amazon's $9.99 ceiling on new and bestselling titles. Though prices are expected to be in the range of $12.99 to $14.99 for new titles in hardcover, that won't mean titles as low as $9.99 will disappear.

According to anonymous sources speaking to the New York Times, the agreements with publishers include provisions to discount book prices on bestsellers, similar to the practice used in brick and mortar stores such as Borders. Furthermore, prices for e-book editions of titles that retail below the typical $26 price for a hardcover would be sold below $14.99 as well.

We likely won't know more details until the iPad ships and the iBookstore is open for business, but it seems like the agreements between publishers and Apple offer something for both groups. Publishers get more flexibility in pricing, and Apple gets to offer some titles at comparably discounted prices.

Wednesday, 17 February 2010

Warner succeeds in bullying Redbox into 28-day release delay

Only a month after Netflix announced it was giving into Warner Bros. and delaying new releases, DVD rental kiosk company Redbox has decided to do the same. Warner announced Tuesday that it had entered into a "multi-year distribution agreement" with Redbox that will allow Redbox to officially carry Warner's DVD and Blu-ray offerings—28 days after they are released to the retail market. The agreement will be the end of the lawsuit between the two companies—and marks a short-term victory in Warner's attempts to prop up the dying DVD market. The numbers don't lie: the market for new DVDs has been falling for years now, with the latest data showing that disc sales dropped by a full 13 percent in the US between 2008 and 2009 alone.

Warner made no secret of the reason for the move. "The 28-day window enables us to get the most from the sales potential of our titles and maximize VOD usage," Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Group president Kevin Tsujihara said in a statement.

Redbox started out by acquiring its major DVD releases from wholesalers that sell to all manner of retail outlets (Target, Walmart, etc.). To them, Redbox was just another buyer looking to acquire product, and Redbox did not have direct relationships with any of the studios (save Sony).

The studios came to despise Redbox for its business model, however. The company's kiosks, which house more than 600 DVDs at a time, rent out movies for $1 per day and sell used movies for $7. Redbox's Web-based inventory system makes it possible for consumers to select their movies over the Internet and reserve them in advance at a specified Redbox kiosk.

Ultimately, some of the studios were able to persuade wholesalers to stop selling movies to Redbox. The DVD-rental outlet got around that limitation by sending staffers out to Target, Walmart, and other retailers armed with corporate credit cards. The staffers would snap up new releases to be loaded into the ubiquitous kiosks.

Redbox's determination to stock and rent new releases, according to the major studios, was both an insult and the equivalent of stealing money straight out of their children's mouths. "Having our [movies] rented at $1 in the rental window is grossly undervaluing our products," News Corp. said when it decided to sue Redbox over its rental kiosks. Universal also sued Redbox, and Redbox sued everyone back, including Warner Bros.

The latest deal, however, means that the lawsuit against Warner is over and Redbox will have easier access to the studio's offerings. "This agreement enables redbox to fulfill our commitment to providing consumers affordable and convenient home entertainment," Redbox president Mitch Lowe said in a statement, probably while nursing his wounds. "By agreeing to a delayed release date, Redbox can now acquire Warner Home Video titles at a reduced product cost, preserving value for our consumers and increasing customer access to Warner titles at redbox locations nationwide."

This deal, at least from a consumer perspective, is nearly identical to one that Warner entered into with DVD rental and streaming house Netflix in January. Again, the companies cheerfully claimed that the agreement would mean easier access to Warner Bros. movies, as long as Netflix wouldn't let a single one out of its grasp until 28 days had passed from the time the DVDs hit the market.

Warner's deals with both Netflix and Redbox show the industry's commitment to doing everything it can to keep a slowly-dying media form alive as long as possible. A large part of that fight has been to cripple rental availability, whether through Netflix, Redbox, or others. It's a victory for the studios—and a loss for consumers. The only way this will pay off is if sufficient numbers of movie fans decide they absolutely can't wait an additional four weeks to rent the Hollywood blockbusters they missed in the theater and snap up the new DVDs.